Prologue
Reading
Prologue
5 min read
Section01
Introduction
Let me tell you why I am here, and why you are reading this book.
I have always been one of those people who need to touch, test, and experiment. If a new technology product or service appears on the table, I cannot help wanting to get my hands on it before anyone explains what it is for. So when, in 2022, the first GPT-based systems began to circulate in very limited circles and, shortly afterwards, the first access to ChatGPT arrived, I was there: exploring in the dark, with no manual, no reference community, and hardly anyone to compare notes with. It was almost virgin territory. I tried the obvious things: simple questions, translations, summaries. None of those first interactions truly shook me. Until one day, driven by that mix of curiosity and healthy skepticism every engineer carries somewhere inside, I decided to give it a real challenge.
As a chess player, I know the eight queens problem well: placing eight queens on a chessboard so that none threatens any of the others. It is not a trivial problem. It has more than one solution, and solving it requires a recursive algorithm that explores and discards possible combinations. Any experienced programmer knows that this kind of logic requires thinking through the structure before writing a single line of code. I wrote the prompt in a completely plain way, with no tricks, without specifying the language in detail, without defining the architecture: "I want you to write Java source code that solves the problem of placing eight chess queens on a board so that none of them threaten each other." Nothing more. And, within seconds, there it was. I copied it, pasted it, compiled it, ran it... and what appeared on my screen left me frozen: a simulated chessboard, eight queens perfectly placed so that none threatened any other, and a button that allowed me to navigate through the different valid solutions to the problem. I sat there in silence for a while, staring at the screen and checking the validity of each possible solution.
That silence had a particular weight. Because in that instant I understood that what had just happened was not a sophisticated autocomplete exercise. That machine had understood what I was asking, even though I had not been especially precise. It knew enough chess to understand how queens attack. It had grasped the complexity of the specific problem. It had designed and implemented a correct recursive algorithm. It had translated that logic into functional Java code. And, on top of that, it had built a user interface with navigation logic that responded exactly to what my question, deep down, actually needed. It had not only solved the problem. It had interpreted it for me.
I remember thinking, almost feverishly, about everything this implied beyond the chessboard. If it could do this, what could it not do with a legal, medical, financial, educational, or industrial problem? How many professions, how many processes, how many certainties built over decades were about to be reconfigured from the ground up? It was not an orderly or calm thought. It was more like an avalanche. The same sensation I imagine the first engineer must have felt when he saw a steam engine move a piston and understood, in a fraction of a second, that the world would never be the same again. That was 2022 for me. The compass had turned, and it never went back.
I admit it: it was not the first time I had felt that kind of jolt. There are moments in the life of a technology professional when the ground shifts beneath your feet and you know, with a certainty that needs no external validation, that something fundamental has changed forever. The first of those moments came for me in the year 2000, with the Internet. I remember the feeling perfectly. Suddenly, all the information in the world was beginning to connect: accessible, alive, in motion. Distances collapsed. Intermediaries became less necessary. Business models that had worked for decades began to creak. At first, it was a silent revolution, almost invisible to most people. But for those of us working in technology, it was absolutely clear that this was not a passing trend. It was the beginning of a reconfiguration of civilization.
Then came the second wave: mobile devices. The Internet was no longer something you connected to from a desktop computer in a fixed place. Suddenly, the Internet was you. It lived in your pocket, followed you everywhere, and brought with it new platforms, new economies, and new social behaviors that nobody had fully anticipated. Each of those waves was enormous and transformative. Each created winners and losers on a scale never seen before in modern business history.
But when I compare those moments with what I was seeing in 2022, there is one truly consequential difference. It is not a difference of nature. It is a difference of speed. The Internet took years to penetrate the everyday lives of most people. Smartphones needed roughly a decade to fully redesign the global social and economic fabric. Generative AI, however, did not offer us that courtesy. ChatGPT reached 100 million monthly active users in just two months, according to UBS estimates cited by Reuters, and for a time it was the fastest-growing consumer application ever documented. Two months. That is not an anecdotal figure, nor a number designed to impress in a presentation. It is the clearest signal that this time the rules of the game are radically different. There is no time to watch from the sidelines. There is no maturity cycle slow enough to allow us to adapt later. The window between the moment something appears and the moment it has already changed everything is, right now, smaller than ever. And that realization (the awareness that the clock no longer runs at the rhythm we learned to read) is what drove me to write this book.
LiveThis is already happening
Facts from the present that illuminate or challenge this chapter's thesis.
Google DeepMindJul 21, 2025Supports the thesis
Gemini with Deep Think Reaches Gold-Medal Standard at IMO 2025
In one year, DeepMind moves from silver to gold: the model solves problems in natural language, without Lean formalization, within the competition's official time limit.
Editorial take
The delta is 12 months. For readers: this is exactly the pace the book describes — capabilities that last year were "near-human" move in one cycle to "top human." If your roadmap has a 3-year horizon, reconsider it.
OpenAIAug 7, 2025Supports the thesis
OpenAI Launches GPT-5 with Leaps in Coding, Math, and Reasoning
GPT-5 replaces GPT-4o as ChatGPT's default model. It shifts toward an 'intelligence classes' system that automatically routes each query to the appropriate sub-model, and reduces hallucinations by around 45% with search enabled.
Editorial take
For readers: the news is not the model, it is the cadence. GPT-5 arrives less than 18 months after GPT-4, and in the months that followed, OpenAI released 5.2, 5.4-Cyber, and 5.5. If your AI strategy is built around 'the best model on the market,' it was outdated before you got it approved.
NvidiaMar 18, 2024Supports the thesis
Nvidia Announces Blackwell GB200 Platform — 25× Lower Cost and Energy Than Hopper
Blackwell delivers 30× more LLM inference performance than the H100, at 25× lower energy consumption and cost. Adopted by AWS, Google Cloud, Azure, Oracle, Cisco, Dell, and Supermicro since its announcement.
Editorial take
For readers: The exponential curve in cost-per-inference is now firmly established. Any business model built on the premise that 'AI is expensive' has a shelf life of roughly 18 months. Recalculate your unit economics assuming that the cost per query falls by an order of magnitude with each generation.
OpenAIJan 21, 2025Adds evidence
OpenAI, Oracle, SoftBank and MGX Announce Stargate — $500B in AI Infrastructure Across the U.S.
A joint venture with an immediate commitment of $100B and $500B over four years to build AI data centers on American soil. Trump announced the project on his second day in office.
Editorial take
AI has become critical infrastructure on par with electricity or telecommunications. For readers: when a country commits half a trillion dollars over four years, it is no longer a bet — it is a military-economic race with a defense-scale budget.
NatureMay 8, 2024Adds evidence
AlphaFold 3 Predicts Joint Structure of Proteins, DNA, RNA, and Ligands
Google DeepMind and Isomorphic Labs publish in Nature a diffusion architecture that dramatically improves prediction of interactions among biomolecules. AlphaFold Server opens free access for non-commercial research.
Editorial take
Computational chemistry crosses a threshold: it no longer merely suggests candidates — it constructs the complete molecular complex. For readers: the drug discovery cycle is set to compress from years to months. Models are moving from oracles to laboratory colleagues.
NvidiaMar 18, 2025Adds evidence
Nvidia Unveils Blackwell Ultra GB300 NVL72 with 1.5× More Performance Than GB200
Announced at GTC 2025. The new generation, aimed at reasoning inference, multiplies potential AI factory revenue by 50 compared to Hopper. Deployment expected by late 2025.
Editorial take
12 months between Blackwell and Blackwell Ultra. For readers: the cadence is now annual, and if you bought hardware a year ago, it has just dropped to the second tier. AI CapEx has a shorter useful life than accounting models suggest.
Lawrence Livermore National LaboratoryOct 15, 2025Adds evidence
NIF Achieves Fusion Ignition for Tenth Time with 8.6 MJ Yield and Gain of 4.13
Lawrence Livermore has confirmed its tenth ignition. The April 2025 experiment delivered 8.6 MJ from 2.08 MJ of laser input, a gain of 4.13 and a new all-time record. The October 2025 shot produced 3.5 MJ. The program is now entering an industrial optimization phase.
Editorial take
Fusion is moving from science fiction to yield engineering. For readers: once something becomes repeatable, the timeline is set by capital, not by physics. The conversation shifts from 'if' to 'when on the grid.'
GoogleNov 18, 2025Adds evidence
Google Launches Gemini 3 Pro and Deep Think, Replacing 2.5 and Opening Advanced Reasoning
Gemini 3 Pro and the Deep Think variant succeed Gemini 2.5. Deep Think reached gold-medal level at the 2025 International Mathematical Olympiad, a capability previously reserved for the world's top human performers.
Editorial take
'Elite human' mathematical reasoning is no longer exclusive. For readers: if your competitive advantage rested on the complexity of your analysis, be prepared. The frontier is not moving toward creativity or ethics — it is moving there.
Live data from the observatory
Figures from the editorial observatory that anchor this chapter. Each number declares its source, confidence and a link to the full dashboard.
Jobs that will change by 2030
22%
Unchanged since the printed edition · checked May 30, 2026
WEF projection (170M new roles, 92M displaced).
Source · World Economic ForumHigh confidence
Global jobs exposed to AI
~40%
Unchanged since the printed edition · checked May 30, 2026
Up to ~60% in advanced economies, per the IMF.
Source · IMFHigh confidence
Mentor
Mentor — assisted reading
Ask the mentor about the demo. It only answers from what this chapter says.
Start here:
FormatsBuy
Choose the format that best fits you
Each format has its place. The print book to underline and revisit. The eBook to carry always. The web app to live the interactive edition.
Print book
Amazon
Print edition via Amazon. The full reading experience: underline, annotate, return to the pages that matter.
Buy on AmazoneBook
Kindle
Kindle edition. Synced with your library, ready to highlight and export notes.
Buy on KindleeBook
Google Play Books
Read on Android, web, or any device connected to your Google account.
Coming soonNotify meWeb app · Interactive book
Interactive book
The interactive layer: navigable index, infographics, tools, mentor, and news that update the book as reality shifts.
Open interactive bookPrologue